![]() I am not a crypto expert but both algorithm seem a reasonable choice. Amazon S3 uses AES while Crashplan uses Blowfish for encrypting your data. Encryptionīoth services provide encryption support. You can even access you data through the crash plan mobile apps. Additionally the client not only allows you to backup your data to the Crashplan cloud but also to the other computer or folders (for free). The client works right ot of the box and has plenty of settings to customize the systems. Crashplan on the other hand comes with a pretty nice client which automatically check which files have been changed or added and automatically uploads them to the cloud. All of them though are manually though, meaning you have to remember to upload your files and you have remember which files you need to upload. There exists various clients (e.g., s3cmd, CyberDuck) which allow you do up-/download data from Amazon S3. ConvenienceĪmazon S3 and Glacier mostly consists of a web interface and a set of APIs to implement your own clients. This is especially try if you keep in mind that my storage requirement will monotonically increase. Being able to backup all my data for as little as $3.50 per month without additional fees for retrieving them is a no brainer. In Amazon I pay currently about $2 per month just for storing the core of my work (as mentioned above you pay a premium for restoring Glacier data). In my case I signed up for a year contract and pay $3.50 per month. You pay a monthly fee and can backup as much data as you want. In the case of Crashplan pricing is straight forward: it is a flat rate. ![]() I still do not understand why Amazon had to restore ~253GB for my 2GB request, especially as all my current data in S3 + Glacier combined does not even remotely add up to that amount of data ?!? For instance I recently restored to 2 files with a total less than 2GB and got the following bill. $5 per month for Glacier does not look to bad but you can do better, especially as additionally to the storage fees Glacier has extra fees for restoring the files and transferring data in and out of Glacier. While this seems not too bad on first sight, if you crunch the numbers you will see that storing 500GB of data in S3 will cost you about $50 per month and in Glacier about $5 per month. PricingĪt the time of this writing Amazon S3 cost about $0.1 per GB per month and Glacier about $0.01 per GB per month. The following sections compare both Amazon S3 and Crashplan by looking at different aspects and comparing both services with each other. In the long run I want to backup all my pictures online and not only the core of my work. I store my pictures and my main Lightroom catalog on external hard drives in a raid configuration for added redundancy. So far I used Amazon S3 (more precisely Amazon Glacier) to backup my keeper shoots (which is about 35GB worth of data). I have about ~500GB worth of data (mostly pictures and some videos). In this post I will layout why this switch made sense for me and might make sense for you as well. I am in the middle of the moving my online backup system from Amazon S3 to Crashplan.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |